Opposition to the TPP agreement covers a number of issues. The secrecy of the negotiations is considered undemocratic. Moreover, these opponents add that trade agreements are believed to be the source of foreign competition that contributes to the loss of production jobs in the United States. In addition, some opponents are concerned about the “Investor-State Dispute Settlement Clause” (ISDR), which allows companies to sue national governments that violate trade agreements. While neither Biden nor Trump said they would try to join the CPTPP, they both expressed support for the idea on different points. Biden supported the TPP as vice president and recently stressed the importance of the United States establishing the rules for road trade. Candidate Trump strongly denounced the TPP in 2016, but in 2018, as president, he proposed that the United States join the CPTPP before saying it would take a major renegotiation. In 2013, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz warned that it would “serve the interests of the richest” based on the drafts of the TPP.   The work organized in the United States argued during the negotiations that the trade agreement would primarily benefit businesses at the expense of manufacturing and service workers.  The Economic Policy Institute and the Center for Economic and Policy Research argued that the TPP could lead to job losses and lower wages.
  There were conflicting arguments as to whether or not the TPP would like to strengthen trade liberalization. For the arguments suggesting that the TPP will succeed in liberalizing exchanges between participating nations, the question arises as to whether or not this leads to a positive or negative net change. Some scientists argue that the participatory members of the TPP believe that such membership is a utilitarian and practical method for further trade liberalization.  Scholars Peter Petri and Michael Plummer describe the TPP as a “dynamic – and exemplary, process of competitive liberalization,” and this described liberalization can lead to a new mode of governance for Asia-Pacific as well as transnational trade.  Unlike most agreements, the CPTPP eliminates non-tariff trading blocs. In addition, rules and statutes will be harmonized. It shares these characteristics with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The Electronic Frontier Foundation criticized the leak of the proposed chapter on intellectual property, which covers copyright, trademarks and patents. In the United States, they believed that this would further strengthen controversial aspects of U.S.
copyright (such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) and limit Congress` ability to participate in national law reform to meet the evolving intellectual property needs of U.S. citizens and the innovative technology sector. The standardization of copyright rules by other signatories would also require significant changes to copyright law in other countries. These include, according to the EFF, the obligation for countries to extend copyright rules, to limit fair dealing, to impose criminal sanctions for copyright violations that are not commercially motivated (for example. B, sharing copyrighted digital media files), taking on greater responsibility for internet intermediaries, strengthening the protection of digital blockages and creating new threats to journalists and whistleblowers.  Last week, President Trump asked his trade team to review the re-approval of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), now known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (PPAC) Comprehensive Agreement.